I can tell myself that
repugnance and horror are the mainsprings of my desire.
Georges
Bataille[1]
Somewhere beyond the
regularity and banality of the modern life, threaded among the interstices of the
social fabric we call
"civilization," there are private worlds where the chaotic pounds out
its own tumultuous rhythms,
where desire untrammeled by convention is propelled by a primal sense of
urgency and experimentation. The place of
imagination inhabited by the protagonists of J.G. Ballard's cult novel
Crash, now a David Cronenberg
film, is one such world.
First published in 1973, Crash is a
tenderly brutal apocalyptic novel
depicting the violent couplings of the body with technology. Crash
eroticizes, even fetishizes, the car crash
and all of its players, the intensity of desire directly related to the intensity of
the impact and its creative
transformation of the soft and yielding body. Non-narrative in structure,
Crash is impelled by dint of the
desire and sexual liaisons of its similarly-minded protagonists. This is no ordinary
"road trip."
Cronenberg's low-budget adaptation of
Crash paints with a realistic
brush images of isolation over a barren highway "landscape." The
natural world seldom intrudes upon the
narrative, the mise-en-scene alternating between bleak concrete highways and
parking garages, the warmth of flesh
tones, the gleam of chrome, and the drab and ugly furnishings of the modern
age. There is the almost painterly
composition of crash victims, the delicacy of the hair framing Catherine Ballard's
face, and the darkened tonalities
of the bedclothes which illuminating skin moistened by the steady exertion of
sex. The protagonists speak in
intimate, hushed tones the better to hear the hum of traffic, to
hear the roar of the engine as it
accelerates, to revel in the shattering din of impact. Howard Shore's score is
subtle, sparse, and with the
dissonance of small twinges of pain.
Despite being vilified as pornography and
at times censored for its apparent
amorality, Crash posits a society, an ethic, not unfamiliar; indeed, in some
ways Crash is simply a
peculiar love story, a narrative of empathy and tenderness surpassing the norm
for the privatized spaces of
modernity.
Pornography
Culture
Crash debuted successfully at the
Cannes Film Festival in May 1996,
taking the Special Jury Prize. In November 1996, it was awarded a Genie for best
direction. All told, it has played
uncut in 20 counties, with great box office success in some. That success,
however, did not extend to Britain, the
home of J.G. Ballard. For soon after its debut at Cannes, elements within
the British press began a vociferous
campaign for its suppression. That such a strident campaign was staged in
Britain is particularly ironic in light of the
condemnation of the British and other tabloid press which unfolded after the
Princess of Wales was killed, an incident
which struck a chord in many who had seen Crash or read the book.
The indictment of Crash within the
British press was based upon its
perverse fusion of sex and technology. It didn't help that the couplings within
the film were multiple and varied,
blending auto-eroticism and other sexual combinations considered quite beyond
the pale of sexual permissibility in
proper British society. Presiding over the negative review run in the June 3,
1996 Evening Standard was the
headline, "A movie beyond the bounds of depravity."[2] The
November 9th issue of the Daily
Mail proclaimed, "Morality dies in the twisted wreckage."[3] Perhaps more to the
point was the related front-page article on the Daily Mail of the same
date headlined "Ban This Car
Crash Sex Film."[4] Especially disturbing to the Daily Mail
was the fact that "the
initially heterosexual characters lose their inhibitions [and] they experiment
pleasurably with gay sex, lesbian sex,
and sex with cripples."[5] In short, these articles
condemned Crash as
pornography.
Notes
1. Georges Bataille, Erotism: Death & Sensuality. San
Francisco: City Lights Books (1986), p.
59.
2. Kermode, Mark and Petley, Julian, "Road Rage" in Sight and
Sound, June 1977, p. 16.
3. Ibid, p. 16
4. Ibid, p.16.
5. Ibid, p.16
|